Forensic Movie Review: Vikrant Massey-Radhika Apte’s Whodunit Thriller Fails To Leave A Mark
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Forensic Movie Review: Vikrant Massey-Radhika Apte’s Whodunit Thriller Fails To Leave A Mark


Story

Story


Forensic

begins
on
a
creepy
note
where
a
birthday
celebration
is
followed
by
the
reveal
of
an
abusive
parent.
The
disturbed
kid
drowns
a
cat
in
a
drum
filled
with
water
and
tiptoes
to
a
room
with
a
sinister
motive.

The
next
sequence
introduces
us
to
forensic
officer
Johnny
Khanna
(Vikrant
Massey)
who
sings
rhymes
and
even
moonwalks
at
crime
scenes.
On
the
other
hand,
sub-inspector
Megha
Sharma
(Radhika
Apte)
is
assigned
to
investigate
the
missing
case
of
a
school
girl.
Soon,
her
dead
body
is
discovered
by
a
local
in
a
trash
pile.

Even
before
Megha
can
wrap
her
head
over
the
crime,
the
hilly
town
is
rocked
by
young
girls
disappearing
one
by
one
on
their
birthdays.
Eventually,
she
realises
that
there’s
more
than
meets
the
eye
when
she
is
joined
by
forensic
officer
Johnny
Khanna
(Vikrant
Massey)
with
whom
she
shares
a
history.
With
the
help
of
Johnny’s
forensic
findings,
the
duo
make
a
shocking
discovery.
Will
this
‘birthday
serial
killer’
get
away
with
the
gruesome
crimes?

Direction

Direction

Director
Vishal
Furia
deserves
brownie
points
for
not
blatantly
remaking
the
original
source
material,
Tovino
Thomas-Mamta
Mohandas’

Forensic

frame-by-frame.
While
the
2020
Malayalam
film
had
a
urban
set-up,
Furia
chooses
the
hilly
town
of
Mussoorie
as
the
backdrop
for
his
whodunit
mystery.
If
you
have
watched
Tovino’s

Forensic

then
there’s
hardly
any
surprises
for
you
in
this
Hindi
adaptation.

A
little
more
sneak-peek
inside
the
forensic
lab
would
have
made
the
screenplay
more
interesting.
Further,
the
addition
of
a
romantic
sub-plot
dilutes
the
intensity
of
the
narrative.
Amid
mutilated
dead
bodies,
serial
killers
and
evidences,
the
director
tries
to
squeeze
in
some
romance
between
the
lead
pair
whose
chemistry
barely
oozes
any
spark.


Forensic

keeps
you
hooked
in
parts
and
pieces
until
Furia
makes
the
big
reveal
which
is
probably
one
of
the
most
outlandish
twists
I
have
seen
in
recent
times.
It
makes
you
wonder
what
the
writers
were
thinking
when
they
cooked
this
idea.
In
forensic
linguistics,
this
third
act
contaminates
the
entire
setup
and
reduces
Forensics
to
a
silly
film.

Also,
did
we
tell
you
that
Dr
Salunkhe
from
the
popular
crime
TV
series
CID
finds
his
way
into
the
narrative
as
Johnny’s
‘forensic’
guru
Dr
Solanki?

Performances

Performances

Vikrant
Massey
as
the
cheeky
forensic
officer
seems
to
be
having
fun
with
his
character
and
sinks
his
teeth
deep
into
it.
He
pulls
it
off
even
when
the
writing
disappoints.
Radhika
Apte
gets
to
don
the
uniform
again
and
delivers
what’s
expected
out
of
her.
Prachi
Desai
as
the
child
psychiatrist
delivers
a
yorker.
Vindu
Dara
Singh
has
nothing
substantial
to
offer.
Ronit
Roy
deserved
a
better-written
role.

Technical Aspects

Technical
Aspects

Vishal
Furia
fails
to
pay
attention
to
a
few
minute
technical
details
in
the
film.
Anshul
Chaubey’s
camerawork
doesn’t
lend
any
tension
in
the
story-telling.
The
movie
also
falters
in
the
editing
department.

Music

Music

The
songs
in
the
film
are
forgettable.
Also,
the
background
score
is
a
damp
squib
and
barely
makes
you
hold
your
breath.

Verdict

Verdict

In
Vishal
Furia’s
psychological
thriller,
the
serial
killer
hypnotizes
young
girls
with
the
snap
of
a
finger.
How
I
wish
that
I
could
do
the
same
to
erase
the
memory
of
the
film’s
third
act
which
is
as
mind-bendingly
silly
as
Johnny’s
nursery
rhymes!



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.